#2 Silk >> refresh and lazy evaluated blocks

Offen
vor 8 Jahren geöffnet von herby · 0 Kommentare

Originally at 2015-02-27T12:14:41Z by Herbert Vojčík

I think the blocks should be used differently when rendered via <<. Old-style Web package behavior of eager evaluation is easily achievable using in: aBlock. Therefore I think blocks should be just stored for later and evaluated (filling appropriate position where they appeared) on demand.

That is, there should be aSilk refresh message, which should evaluate all blocks that were <<'d at the positions that were there at the time.

Originally at 2015-02-27T12:14:41Z by Herbert Vojčík I think the blocks should be used differently when rendered via `<<`. Old-style `Web` package behavior of eager evaluation is easily achievable using `in: aBlock`. Therefore I think blocks should be just stored for later and evaluated (filling appropriate position where they appeared) on demand. That is, there should be `aSilk refresh` message, which should evaluate all blocks that were `<<`'d at the positions that were there at the time.
Anmelden, um an der Diskussion teilzunehmen.
Kein Label
Kein Meilenstein
Niemand zuständig
1 Beteiligte
Laden…
Abbrechen
Speichern
Hier gibt es bis jetzt noch keinen Inhalt.