Axes docs removed low-level API.

But still mentions Axes class >> #parse.

README.md

@@ -60,20 +60,14 @@ to write the data instead.
  - if _subarray_ path element `#(bar)` is read from _foo_, `foo bar` is performed;
  - if _subarray_ path element `#(bar)` is written to _foo_, `foo bar: value` is performed.
 
-###API
+For example reading `container` at axes `#((todos) 1 done)` essentially does
 
-----
-
-```st
-Object >> atAxes: aCollection ifAbsent: aBlock
+```smalltalk
+| x |
+x := container todos at: 1.
+^ x at: 'done'
 ```
 
-For example `container atAxes: #((todos) 1 done) ifAbsent: [...]'` essentially does
-
-	| x |
-	x := container todos at: 1.
-	^ x at: 'done'
-
 But, whenever:
 
   - `container` fails to perform `todos`, or
@@ -82,20 +76,17 @@ But, whenever:
   - `container todos at: 1` fails to perform `at:ifAbsent:`, or
   - `container todos at: 1` does not contain index 'done',
 
-the `ifAbsent` block value is returned.
+the "failed to get" fallback is taken.
 
-----
+Similarly, putting `true` into `container` at axes: `#((todos) 1 done)`
+essentially does
 
-```st
-Object >> atAxes: aCollection ifAbsent: aBlock put: anObject
+```smalltalk
+| x |
+x := container todos at: 1.
+^ x at: 'done' put: true
 ```
 
-For example `container atAxes: #((todos) 1 done) ifAbsent: [...] put: 'foo'` essentially does
-
-	| x |
-	x := container todos at: 1.
-	^ x at: 'done' put: 'foo'
-
 But, whenever:
 
   - `container` fails to perform `todos`, or
@@ -103,19 +94,12 @@ But, whenever:
   - `container todos` does not contain index 1, or
   - `container todos at: 1` fails to do `at:put:`,
 
-the `ifAbsent` block value is returned.
-
-----
-
-```st
-Axes class >> parse: aString
-```
-
-Parses a string to get a proper array index to use with `atAxes:` API.
+the "failed to put" fallback is taken.
 
-The syntax is resembling Smalltalk literal array syntax very closely.
-For example `Axes parse: '(value)'` and `Axes parse: '(todos) 1 done'`
-produce `#((value))` and `#((todos) 1 done)` as results.
+`Axes` class can parse a string representation of axes. The syntax
+of the string representation is resembling Smalltalk literal array syntax
+very closely. For example `Axes parse: '(value)'` and `Axes parse:
+'(todos) 1 done'` produce `#((value))` and `#((todos) 1 done)` as results.
 
 Syntactic sugar: as `(foo)` happens often, to denote unary selector,
 it can be written equivalently as `~foo`, to improve readability.